Difference Between Samarium Cobalt and AlNiCo Magnets

Comparison chart of Samarium Cobalt vs AlNiCo magnets showing strength, temperature resistance, and applications

Samarium Cobalt (SmCo) and AlNiCo are both high-temperature permanent magnets widely used in industrial applications. While they share certain similarities, their differences in magnetic strength, cost, mechanical performance, and application suitability determine which material is more appropriate for specific use cases.

Common Ground

  • High-Temperature Resistance:
    • AlNiCo: up to 550℃
    • SmCo (1:5 type): up to 250℃
    • SmCo (2:17 type): up to 350℃
  • Surface Treatment: Both typically do not require coating or plating unless used in highly corrosive environments.

Performance Comparison

1. Magnetic Properties and Price

  • AlNiCo:
    • Lower magnetic strength and coercivity.
    • Easy to demagnetize under strong external magnetic fields.
    • Price is lower, making it cost-effective for non-demanding applications.
  • SmCo:
    • Stronger magnetism (second only to NdFeB).
    • High coercivity and stable magnetic performance.
    • Price is 4–5 times higher than AlNiCo of the same size (sometimes up to 10x).
Red and silver AlNiCo magnets with high temperature resistance and corrosion stability

2. Mechanical and Shock Resistance

  • AlNiCo:
    • Brittle against vibration and shock, flux may decrease (~2%).
    • Easier to demagnetize on contact with ferromagnetic materials.
  • SmCo:
    • Withstands vibration (10g) and shock (100g) without demagnetization.
    • Resistant to friction/contact demagnetization.
    • Fragile in structure—prone to breakage if dropped or impacted.
Samarium Cobalt magnets with strong coercivity and brittle material structure

3. Magnetic Crystal Structure

  • AlNiCo:
    • Cubic crystal with multiple easy magnetization directions → multi-pole possible.
    • Small anisotropy constant (K), coercivity improved mainly by shape anisotropy (elongated forms perform better).
  • SmCo:
    • Hexagonal (1:5) or rhombohedral (2:17) → single easy magnetization direction.
    • High anisotropy constant (K), giving it inherently higher coercivity.

4. Chemical Resistance

  • AlNiCo: Excellent chemical stability, resistant to most corrosion environments.
  • SmCo: Sensitive to acids, alkalis, and salt spray—requires careful handling in harsh environments.

Performance Comparison Table

FeatureAlNiCo MagnetSmCo Magnet
Max. Working Temp.~550℃250℃ (1:5), 350℃ (2:17)
Magnetic StrengthModerateStrong (2nd only to NdFeB)
CoercivityLowHigh
PriceLow (baseline)4–5x AlNiCo (up to 10x)
Shock/VibrationWeak, flux loss under impactStable under vibration & shock
FragilityDurable against breakageBrittle, easy to chip or crack
Chemical ResistanceExcellentPoor in acid/alkali/salt environment
MagnetizationMultipole possibleSingle magnetic pole

Application Recommendations

  • AlNiCo: Suitable for applications requiring high temperature stability, corrosion resistance, and low cost, such as sensors, measuring instruments, and generators.
  • SmCo: Preferred for applications requiring high magnetic strength, high coercivity, and shock resistance, such as aerospace, defense systems, high-precision motors, and medical devices.

Conclusion

While both AlNiCo and SmCo are high-temperature permanent magnets, their performance profiles differ significantly. AlNiCo offers cost-effectiveness and durability in chemically harsh environments but has weaker magnetic properties. SmCo provides stronger, more stable magnetism and superior resistance to demagnetization, albeit at higher costs and with greater material brittleness.

In B2B procurement, the choice depends on balancing cost, operating environment, and performance requirements.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *